Thursday, June 30, 2011

selena gomez bikini in hawaii

images Justin Bieber Selena Gomez selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Selena Gomez Bikini Candids in
  • Selena Gomez Bikini Candids in

  • waitforevergc
    05-09 09:20 PM down..

    Let us not give people like 'Hunter' too much weightage.
    Ignore trolls.

    Posters like Hunter get some sort of sadistic pleasure bashing India and Indians.
    Let us ignore them.

    And mods, please block such posters like Hunter in future. Such a waste of space.

    wallpaper Selena Gomez Bikini Candids in selena gomez bikini in hawaii. May 27, 2011. Selena
  • May 27, 2011. Selena

  • amitjoey
    06-25 12:42 PM
    IV members have saved you a lot of money on attorney phone calls, getting answers to medical test questions and other general questions. Please contribute to IV so that we can keep this effort going. While everybody is busy collecting documents and paperwork for 485, core IV again is doing there personal paperwork and + lobbying.
    Please contribute, especially if you are new and never contributed. Please do not be a freeloader and get your questions answered and run away.

    selena gomez bikini in hawaii. selena gomez bikini in hawaii.
  • selena gomez bikini in hawaii.

  • sk2006
    09-27 06:00 PM
    Two things about VONAGE:

    1. Tax kills the deal. For me its coming more than $31 per month.
    2. I searched on google about calls review. Many people are complaining that the call quality is not that good. On peak times, they do face issues.

    Still calling unlimited india is a very tempting idea.;)

    Taxes are inevitable!
    I personally haven't seen any issues with Call quality. Infact Call quality is excellent.

    2011 May 27, 2011. Selena selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez

  • trueguy
    08-20 11:49 PM
    Thats exactly what it is... Now folks take a look here. These were the dates before July 2007.
    It will be resonable to assume that these will be the dates in OCT bulletien for Eb3-I.
    Finally, 5882 is our only hope for now.

    On what basis you are saying that Oct'2008 PD will be similar to Jun'2007. Didn't you read the note in Sep'2008 VB that PD for EB3 category will retrogress further.

    If you cann't support EB3 community then at least don't misguide people here. EB3-I is in severe pain right now and people like you can't understand it.


    selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Justin Bieber Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber Selena Gomez

  • vbkris77
    06-18 11:57 AM
    Your reasoning is weak. If the same Goldman manager wants to screw you - he won't see if it is recession or not - he will screw you - period.

    What happens with ICE and goldman is an issue they sort it out. If his budget is tight - he will figure out a way.

    As far as jobs are concerned - there is no gaurantee that the best and brightest is always in jobs or those who suck up always have jobs - YOU are responsible on how you choose and carve your career

    I agree to all the law abiding people here... But be just a word of caution, it can bite you back.

    Now a days we are seeing lot of protentionism not from laws, but from hiring managers. Most companies now taking projects that can give them local resources only (H1B/L1B/GC/EAD/USC etc. but physically prsent). Look at utilization percentage in offshore companies. So if they say, I only require GC/USC and not H1/L1, there is no way you would be able to challenge them. I can deal with things on a level playing ground and I don't have "suck it up" attitude.

    This GC/USC alone job ads will be lot safe for them if you guys go on a mass scale. If they can't find a guy, most companies now a days are putting off projects and wait. So your campaign on this scale will not help H1Bs at all.

    Don't think you will always get what you see.. This is a web and pulling just one string is not possible.

    selena gomez bikini in hawaii. hot Bikini-Clad Selena Gomez
  • hot Bikini-Clad Selena Gomez

  • ArkBird
    09-09 04:26 PM
    Done. Called *.*


    selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Justin Bieber Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber Selena Gomez

  • jungalee43
    09-09 07:10 PM
    First of all the progress of this thread so depressing.

    Finished calling all in the list. Generally the response from Dems was better, I felt good after talking in Dem's offices.
    Similarly general response from Repub's was short (even curt), not very enthusiastic.

    2010 selena gomez bikini in hawaii. selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Justin Bieber Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber Selena Gomez

  • Hunter
    05-10 10:43 PM
    Corruption in India called as Corruption and illegal there, but here you fools call it as lobbying. You know what When I started reading this thread I have some sympathy, but I will celebrate it now.
    You know what having sex with mother and sisters, and with animals is not development (Don’t believe go and look at your mother, Son). You are in Stone Age fool. :mad:

    Are you sure you are not confusing with Indian epics that discuss how Lord Brahma had sex with his own daughter? :D :D

    Unfortunately, you are showing your culture here with responses like this by clearly proving that you are incapable of provding a proper response. You are not making any case here, actually you are undermining it. This clearly shows the contempt that you have for the people of the country where you are desparately trying to immigrate to.

    If things were so rosy in India compared to US, you wouldn't be posting in this forum, will you?

    As a matter of fact, people like you, irrespective of the qualifications, should never be allowed to immigrate to anywhere. You should remain in India or should I say "arsha-bharatha"?


    selena gomez bikini in hawaii. selena gomez justin bieber
  • selena gomez justin bieber

  • ourgcapproved
    08-17 02:21 PM
    ok.. the letter is dated 4th august and did you get any information again that your case is assigned to a officer? if yes can you please tell how you contacted them? and after how many days?

    hair Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Justin Bieber Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber Selena Gomez

  • alias
    08-07 11:13 AM
    Yes, that is the part of the problem

    Dude, if that is your problem you should be in EB10, you can't even perform your job well and therefore should be under least desired category...


    selena gomez bikini in hawaii. makeup Selena Gomez in Hot
  • makeup Selena Gomez in Hot

  • rose2652
    02-21 03:04 PM
    Can someone please help me with this? I am worried to the core!

    I have a couple of very urgent questions that I want to check with you folks:

    I am currently in the US on L1 Individual visa - my current visa is expiring on the 10th of March. My employer filed for a fresh L1 Blanket Visa instead of doing an extension because I have to be in India for a few days in March anyway. My visa interview is on the 11th of March.

    My first question is: Is this alright? Am I going to have any problems because I did not extend my visa and applied for a fresh one instead? I have just been in the US for 5 months in my current visa.

    Second question is related to PIMS:
    I have had 3 L1 visas till date - first one was stamped in 2003. Second in 2005 and my current one in 2006. I have never overstayed and I was out of the US for 13 months before I came on my current visa in Oct 2007.
    Will I face any delays due to PIMS when I go for stamping on Mar 11? I plan to be back and rejoin work on the 18th of March.

    Is PIMS delaying folks only in case of L1/H1 extensions? Looking forward to your help and guidance. Thanks a lot.


    hot Justin Bieber Selena Gomez selena gomez bikini in hawaii. pictures Selena Gomez in
  • pictures Selena Gomez in

  • gtg506p
    01-09 08:55 AM
    I just contacted my senator's local office .working on the letters now .Thanks IV for coming up with this wonderful initiative..I hope our community gathers around and works together to make this a success , please put bickering and cynicism to rest for sometime and work pro actively on this new IV action item..

    Thanks IV. I think this is much easier for hundreds of people to participate as its easy, doesent take up too much time etc. and brings about our points across as compared to DC rally (please dont get me wrong here it was great but difficult for lot of people to attend because of various reasons). So I think we should spread out word about this as much as possible. Again, please dont get me wrong. Thank you.


    house selena gomez bikini hawaii. selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Love: Selena Gomez
  • Love: Selena Gomez

  • prashantkh
    07-09 07:03 PM
    We should send emails to Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Jay Leno, David Letterman, Conan O'Brian, Jimmy Kimmel etc.

    They have tremendous amount of viewership and seems like a perfect material for these shows. I will send email to these guys but if more and more peple can make them aware of this development, this news can potentially snowball. :D

    tattoo hot Bikini-Clad Selena Gomez selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Bikini-Clad Selena Gomez And
  • Bikini-Clad Selena Gomez And

  • BharatPremi
    09-24 11:42 PM
    Why dont USCIS clarify on the report they put out

    1. Lack of description and detail about what it is ?
    2. No time stamp on the report
    3. Provide some commentary and detail about the parameters used in the report.

    Becuase It is USCIS :D


    pictures Justin Bieber Selena Gomez selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Selena Gomez in Sexy Bikini
  • Selena Gomez in Sexy Bikini

  • nrk
    08-17 02:05 PM

    Your Case Status: Decision

    On August 17, 2010, we mailed you a notice that we had registered this customer's new permanent resident status. Please follow any instructions on the notice. Your new permanent resident card should be mailed within 60 days following this registration or after you complete any ADIT processing referred to in the welcome notice, whichever is later. If you move before receiving your card, please call our customer service center at 1-800-375-5283.

    During this step the formal decision (approved/denied) is written and the decision notice is mailed and/or emailed to the applicant/petitioner. You can use our current processing time to gauge when you can expect to receive a final decision.

    Case Status changed to Decision..with the above message today.

    After 2 failed marriages (i mean with 2 different companies)...some risk-taking ..coz, i left my second employer after crossing 200 days since filing I-485 , Used EAD and took up full-time employment with an awesome organization , and then later 2nd employer revoking I-140 that lead to an RFE ...and USCIS keeping the status Response received since Jan 2009 ...and now this ...after opening an SR on 08/10..Looks like it took an exact week since the SR was created.

    Of course, my roller-coaster was a small one compared to the rest of the friends in this forum.. Good luck to all and thanks to one and everyone.


    dresses pictures Selena Gomez in selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Selena Gomez in ikini with
  • Selena Gomez in ikini with

  • MCQ
    11-12 12:18 PM
    For more information, we went to visit our home country and re-entered from JFK with no issue twice after 2004. We got H4 tranfered, EAD advanced Payrole too with no issue al all. Looks like "nunc pro tunc" is the solution according to Murthy. Anybody has experience with "nunc pro tunc" please post your experience.
    gc4me - I have experience using "nunc pro tunc" - and it saved my I-485 (AC21).
    I had just come back from vacation (09/01) and the Officer at the POE stamped my I-94 with the date on my visa (11/01), instead of the date of my then H1-B extension I-797 approval notice (03/03) which I had with me.
    I explained to her she had stamped the wrong date, she said that was all I was allowed. I tought this wrong so mentioned it my attorney when I got home. My attorney confirmed that the POE Officer was wrong - so drafted a letter for me to take to my local INS Office to get the card corrected - along with one of her paralegal assistants. The Officer at the INS office took one look at the letter and supporting documents and told me I was ok as the I-797 had me covered to 2003. The paralegal then typed up a eport of the meeting with the INS, saying everything was ok, and we thought that was the end of the matter.
    How wrong we were.
    I next left the US to go on vacation in November 2002. By this time I had renewed my visa through the now non-existant Department of State mail in program, got my Labour Certificate, my I-140 and had filed my I-485. The issue of my erroneously stamped I-94 was a distant memory and I had no trouble getting back into the US with the new Visa, and my I-797.

    The following Februaury my company ran into some problems and I was let go. Luckily I had passed the magic 180 days so was able to invoke AC21 and went to find a new job, which I did. My new employers were quite happy to take over the GC sponsorship as all they had to do was send a letter to the now USCIS and work with their lawyers.

    That's where the trouble started. USCIS got the letter, put it on my file and started their review of my I-485.
    They then sent me an RFE asking me to prove I had been here legally between the expiration of my old I-94 in 11/01 and when I submitted the I-485 in July 2002. (I-485 for AOS can only be submitted if you are legally in the US at time of submittal). I was devastated as it looked as though they were going to deny my I-485 due to an INS mistake.
    As it was more than 365 days from when my I-94 "Expired" till I left on my next trip, I was looking at deportation and a 10 year ban from the United States.

    Luckily it is a good thing I am a pack rat and keep every bit of correspondance between me and my lawyers. I was able to go to my new lawyers with the info and statements from my old lawyers about what had happened back in 2001 with the INS and my I-94 and after getting Sworn Affadavits (on pain of Perjury) from my old lawyer, paralegal and myself, we went to the local USCIS office and made an appointment with the Director and asked for a "Nunc pro Tunc" decision on the I-94 as it was clearly an INS mistake and that we had acted in Good Faith throughout in trusting the INS official.
    We got the "Nunc pro Tunc" and responded to the RFE. Six weeks after that - I got the I-485 Approval notice and my passport stamped the week after.

    The things for anyone to take away from my experience are.
    1. When you realize a mistake has been made - act on it immediately - like I did as soon as I left the airport on September 2001

    2. Document everything - to prove that you acted in Good Faith throughout the process.
    Every conversation you have with someone relating to your case - your employer, your lawyer, the USCIS - get the main points in writing - email is graet for this - fire off an email - get confirmation (ok - not so helpful when talking to USCIS)

    3. Keep EVERYTHING. take photocopies of I-94's, I-797's - everything. Every letter, every email. You never know when you'll need them.

    4. Yes, the Government really does know where everything is in your file and they will catch even the smallest mistake.

    Hope that helps you gc4me. If you can prove you acted in Good Faith throughout the whole process from finding the mistake and trying to correct it - your chances of getting the "nunc pro tunc" go up.



    makeup selena gomez justin bieber selena gomez bikini in hawaii. selena gomez bikini hawaii.
  • selena gomez bikini hawaii.

  • SunnySurya
    08-07 12:40 PM
    No I am not!
    NOW, aren't you ashamed about your sorry job....

    girlfriend Bikini-Clad Selena Gomez And selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
  • Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez

  • H1B-GC
    02-02 04:03 PM

    Can you post the article here? I'm not able to get to it.


    Here you go ::p

    President Takes Dual Tack on Immigration

    White House Seeks Tougher Enforcement,
    While Pushing Idea of Guest-Worker Program
    Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    February 2, 2006; Page A8

    WASHINGTON -- President bush drew big applause during his State of the Union address with a renewed call for "a rational, humane guest-worker program" to keep the economy humming.

    But that appeal came only after Mr. Bush issued a much sterner one first -- for tougher enforcement of immigration laws, more vigilance on the border and an immigration policy that "reflects our values."

    The message Mr. Bush delivered to lawmakers is the same one an increasingly vocal anti-immigration chorus is sending to him: First get tough; then we'll talk.

    Mr. Bush was cheered by an unlikely alliance of pro-business Republicans, Democrats, unions and immigrant groups when he called for a guest-worker program in his State of the Union address two years ago. But the idea has hit a wall of opposition from the party's cultural conservatives and security hawks who first want to stop the flood of illegal immigrants into the U.S. (See related article.)

    In December, the House of Representatives passed legislation that would, among other things, extend a short wall on the border with Mexico to 700 miles. The Senate, which had planned to overhaul immigration laws when it takes up its own bill in a few weeks, now also is under pressure from some Republicans to toughen border controls first.

    As immigration soars to an all-time high, that get-tough argument is gaining political steam. With the 2006 elections still 10 months away, a half-dozen candidates are running for national office on pledges to stop illegal immigration. Bills on the issue, many denying benefits to illegal immigrants, have been introduced in 31 state legislatures.


    • Can President's Plan Keep America Competitive?

    • Bush's Energy Plan Faces Hurdles

    • Industry Cheers Cleaner-Coal Push

    • Full Text: Read the complete prepared text of the address.

    • Question of the Day: Which topic should the Bush administration make its top priority this year?

    And polls show mounting voter unease about immigration: A December 2005 Wall Street Journal-NBC poll found that 57% of those questioned think the U.S. is "too open to immigrants."

    "It's astonishing how much this has become an issue across the country," says Brian Bilbray, a San Diego Republican who hopes to return to the U.S. House of Representatives this year after spending the past six years as a lobbyist for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which wants to restrict immigration.

    But for all the emotion immigration is stirring up, political operatives in both parties warn that it isn't an issue that rallies voters. "Will this impact your electoral ambitions?" asks Ryan Ellis of the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform, who has studied the role immigration played in recent elections. "All history has indicated 'no,' whether you're in Arizona or Maine," he answers.

    It didn't prove a successful strategy for the Virginia governor's race in November. Republican Jerry Kilgore seized late in the campaign on the issue of taxpayer-funded job centers for illegal immigrants, and in a stinging television ad asked of his Democratic opponent, "What part of illegal does Tim Kaine not understand?" Although immigration was only one issue in the campaign, Mr. Kaine won with 52% of the vote.

    Likewise, in December, in a special House election in California's Orange County -- where illegal immigration is a flashpoint -- Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman Project, a volunteer border-patrol group, won just 25% of the vote.

    Mr. Ellis of Americans for Tax Reform also points to seven 2004 Republican primaries where immigration-restriction candidates never won more than 46% of the vote. Among those beating back challenges: Arizona Congressmen James Kolbe and Jeff Flake, who are sponsors of a House bill that would let illegal immigrants earn legal residency in the U.S.

    Candidates who want to restrict immigration seem not to fare well because very few people worry enough about immigration to vote on it -- even though many of them tell pollsters they're worried. In the Wall Street Journal-NBC poll, 78% of those questioned favored "tightening" the border with Mexico -- but only 7% said illegal immigration was their biggest national concern.

    Immigration is "a loud debate that produces few voters," says Frank Sharry, director of the National Immigration Forum, a Washington immigrants-rights group.

    But that doesn't mean immigration won't be talked about this campaign season. Most prominently among 2006 candidates, Rep. Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican, is toying with a symbolic run for the White House. Among other things, Mr. Tancredo wants to deport the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants now in the U.S. and deny citizenship to the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants.

    Immigration restrictionists also have announced runs for governor in Colorado, for the U.S. Senate from California and for a smattering of House seats. San Diego's Mr. Bilbray is running in an April primary to succeed former Rep. Randall "Duke" Cunningham while also pursuing a class-action lawsuit that would prevent California public colleges from offering in-state tuition to illegal aliens.

    Some state legislatures are considering extending in-state tuition, health benefits and driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, even while others want to ban such benefits. In Ohio, a statehouse Republican has said he is considering an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to exclude illegal immigrants from the census counts that are used to apportion Congressional seats.

    Bills in New Hampshire and North Carolina would require local policemen to enforce federal immigration laws, and one in Virginia would require proof of legal residency to obtain a marriage license.

    With Republicans largely leading the anti-immigration charge, the issue is causing heartburn for the national party, which was hoping that its generally pro-immigration stand would help it pick up Hispanic voters. Twelve years ago, California's Republican Gov. Pete Wilson won re-election in part by campaigning for a ballot measure that would deny benefits to illegal aliens -- a rare instance where an anti-immigration stand won the day.

    But a decade passed before Republicans won the governor's office again, and they still haven't won back Hispanic voters. "It was a metaphor for short-term gain, long-term loss," says the National Immigration Forum's Mr. Sharry.

    Republican pollster Ed Goeas says he urges his clients to talk about solutions to illegal immigration instead of focusing on emotion-charged issues like immigrant job centers if they want to win. His firm, the Tarrance Group, does polling for several immigration-restriction candidates, including Mr. Tancredo, he says.

    But in anticipation of the 2006 elections, he's also running voter focus groups to help candidates handle such volatile issues as amnesty for illegal immigrants and whether to allow guest workers to eventually stay in the U.S. After voters let off steam, he says, focus groups show that immigration "becomes a very reasoned conversation very quickly."

    Write to June Kronholz at

    Source : Wall Street Journal : 02/01/2006

    hairstyles makeup Selena Gomez in Hot selena gomez bikini in hawaii. Selena gomez bikini kissing
  • Selena gomez bikini kissing

  • mallu
    10-01 12:41 PM

    08-20 12:28 AM
    The pain of waiting for 9-yrs is nothing compared to the wait now (after dates got current)...Refreshing my yahoo mail on iPhone atleast twice per hour, Clicking on Safari where the last visited page is that of case status online (Click the status btn frequently) --- Life is difficult :(

    Like an ad says: "Stay thirsty my friend", I hope I dont have to stay thirsty "FOREVER".

    God save us from this misery just like u've been saving a few others!!!

    I hear you. Goodluck to us!

    09-24 11:21 AM

    Thanks for the excellent analysis. One question, your analysis assumes category excess visas goto next category on a per country basis, is this correct ?

    Example, EB-1 china number goto EB-2 China ? I thought all EB-1 China numbers are added to the excess pool and then given to most retrogressed EB2 category ?

    Thanks for anyone who clarifies this.

    No matter how the data is sliced and diced, being EB3-I certainly means a wait time ... :)

    No comments:

    Post a Comment