justflie
Oct 31, 11:26 AM
In other news, ThinkSecret was totally off the mark
lol, what else is new
lol, what else is new
revolutionx
Apr 10, 10:51 AM
I have been trying to figure out the this graphic design was achieved?
http://th06.deviantart.net/fs48/300W/i/2009/190/8/3/Paint_Splash_Concept_by_AGNakamura.jpg
It was created by a guy called AGNakamura from deviantart.
http://th06.deviantart.net/fs48/300W/i/2009/190/8/3/Paint_Splash_Concept_by_AGNakamura.jpg
It was created by a guy called AGNakamura from deviantart.
wordoflife
May 1, 07:18 PM
It could be the screen protector, the only way is to check by removing it.
donlphi
Nov 20, 04:32 PM
just to clear something up. This right now appears to be a text-based phone. I don't think Wu is talking about iChat AV functionality. Some other sites (of much, much less accuracy) have been claiming that the iPhone would be able to do videoconferencing and whatnot, but currently there isn't any good evidence to support this, and in my opinion it doesn't look like current 3G GSM cellular networks simply don't have the duplex bandwidth to deliver that kind of content. (and 4G is still a ways off)
This is why I think it is pointless to do it unless you are connected to an EV-DO revision A connection. I don't need another "awesome phone" regardless of how well it syncs with iLIFE. I would much rather be able to travel and show somebody what I see, rather than talk about it or send a photo.
EV-DO revision A allows you to connect wirelessly at speeds fast enough to video chat. TEXT im feature is pointless... I can do that on any phone. I'm sure Apple has figured out a FASTER way to type than T9 Word or something.
We need to forget about this 3G & 4G GSM worthless networks. Sony did it right by pairing up with Sprint. If I didn't hate Windows so much, I would buy that new ultra-portable VAIO TXN17P/T Notebook they just came out with.
Oh well... we'll wait for our 3G or 4G iPhone before getting it right I'm sure.
This is why I think it is pointless to do it unless you are connected to an EV-DO revision A connection. I don't need another "awesome phone" regardless of how well it syncs with iLIFE. I would much rather be able to travel and show somebody what I see, rather than talk about it or send a photo.
EV-DO revision A allows you to connect wirelessly at speeds fast enough to video chat. TEXT im feature is pointless... I can do that on any phone. I'm sure Apple has figured out a FASTER way to type than T9 Word or something.
We need to forget about this 3G & 4G GSM worthless networks. Sony did it right by pairing up with Sprint. If I didn't hate Windows so much, I would buy that new ultra-portable VAIO TXN17P/T Notebook they just came out with.
Oh well... we'll wait for our 3G or 4G iPhone before getting it right I'm sure.
more...
SPUY767
Oct 2, 07:17 AM
God I hate Notes- it's an operating system on top of an operating system. It's databases are just a step up from Access and to be honest - it's a pig.
I've been forced to use the piece a crap for over 5 years (I'm a consultant) and it had brought me great pleasure to help large scale enterprises move away from this overstuffed piece of crap.
Is Exchange any better - yes and no - in general they both are crappy. The biggest advantage of Notes is that their CALs (licenses) are so cheep compared to Exchange/Outlook.
When I start looking for a new job - the first question I'll ask is which Universal Messaging Platform have you deployed in your Enterprise? If they answer "Notes" I'll know the following about their organziation:
1. They care more about the dollar than about usability and employee satisfaction
2. The VP of IT is probably sleeping with the IBM rep
3. The business only uses it because they don't know any better (they've been there too long and have never used anything other than Notes and AOL).
4. They think that Notes databases are cool and hip and truly believe Access is an enterprise level database
5. And finally, they are so damn stupid they probably have Lotus 123 and Word Perfect as their "Office Suite"
"Save me lord from these fools"
Incredibly well thought out comments. You should pat yourself on the back. I especially enjoyed this gem:
3. The business only uses it because they don't know any better (they've been there too long and have never used anything other than Notes and AOL).
That embodies ignorance. It is in fact, just the opposite, more companies use exchange because it's already there and they don't know any better, not to mention that MS practically forces you to use it and they attempt to make it so easy that a baboon could set it up. Notes is good if implemented properly, better than exchange for what it's designed for. I have a feeling you just wanted to flame, so I'm just going to ignore you from now on.
Toodles.
I've been forced to use the piece a crap for over 5 years (I'm a consultant) and it had brought me great pleasure to help large scale enterprises move away from this overstuffed piece of crap.
Is Exchange any better - yes and no - in general they both are crappy. The biggest advantage of Notes is that their CALs (licenses) are so cheep compared to Exchange/Outlook.
When I start looking for a new job - the first question I'll ask is which Universal Messaging Platform have you deployed in your Enterprise? If they answer "Notes" I'll know the following about their organziation:
1. They care more about the dollar than about usability and employee satisfaction
2. The VP of IT is probably sleeping with the IBM rep
3. The business only uses it because they don't know any better (they've been there too long and have never used anything other than Notes and AOL).
4. They think that Notes databases are cool and hip and truly believe Access is an enterprise level database
5. And finally, they are so damn stupid they probably have Lotus 123 and Word Perfect as their "Office Suite"
"Save me lord from these fools"
Incredibly well thought out comments. You should pat yourself on the back. I especially enjoyed this gem:
3. The business only uses it because they don't know any better (they've been there too long and have never used anything other than Notes and AOL).
That embodies ignorance. It is in fact, just the opposite, more companies use exchange because it's already there and they don't know any better, not to mention that MS practically forces you to use it and they attempt to make it so easy that a baboon could set it up. Notes is good if implemented properly, better than exchange for what it's designed for. I have a feeling you just wanted to flame, so I'm just going to ignore you from now on.
Toodles.
Mr. Retrofire
Mar 25, 11:17 AM
iPhone GPS works great for me, even when I visit New York City.
Where is NYC?
;-)
Where is NYC?
;-)
more...
mrfoof82
Nov 19, 02:14 PM
TJ Maxx isn't selling them at a loss. TJ Maxx however is diluting the perceived value of the iPad. That's something all manufacturers -- not just Apple -- look to protect.
It's exactly why Amazon forces you to put some things in your cart to see the price. Amazon can't advertise a product below Price X, according to their agreement with the manufacturer. If they did, Amazon would be diluting the perceived market value of the product, which would force other resellers to follow suit. This forces the market price lower, and then resellers start putting pressure on the manufacturer to lower THEIR price (to resellers) so the retailers/resellers can maintain healthier margins.
It turns into a race towards the bottom, where a product gets commoditized. Manufacturers try to avoid that at all costs, because they only have a few products where they can sell at a high-margin or premium, for so long, before competition creates a pressure to drive the price down.
It's exactly why Amazon forces you to put some things in your cart to see the price. Amazon can't advertise a product below Price X, according to their agreement with the manufacturer. If they did, Amazon would be diluting the perceived market value of the product, which would force other resellers to follow suit. This forces the market price lower, and then resellers start putting pressure on the manufacturer to lower THEIR price (to resellers) so the retailers/resellers can maintain healthier margins.
It turns into a race towards the bottom, where a product gets commoditized. Manufacturers try to avoid that at all costs, because they only have a few products where they can sell at a high-margin or premium, for so long, before competition creates a pressure to drive the price down.
notromeel
Mar 31, 11:00 AM
As a Graphic Designer, when the iPad was announced, this was the first thing I wanted to see. But after experiencing the iPad for over a year, along with a desktop, I don't think this way of working with Photoshop will prove to be beneficial. Lightroom, probably more so.
Just keep it as a Photoshop Express and push the photo adjustment features. Messing with layers, blending modes and brushes I think should remain as features for a desktop for designing.
Lastly, this demo reminds me of JuxtaPoser, a quick two layer masking app.
Just keep it as a Photoshop Express and push the photo adjustment features. Messing with layers, blending modes and brushes I think should remain as features for a desktop for designing.
Lastly, this demo reminds me of JuxtaPoser, a quick two layer masking app.
more...
fawlty
May 2, 04:42 AM
Thank you for referencing one of the greatest films ever!
That post is going straight to the poolroom...
That post is going straight to the poolroom...
peterdevries
Apr 25, 01:59 AM
why even bother coming out with a white iphone for this year? Does anyone really care anymore?
Well, I think this is the best proof that we could get that there won't be a radically designed iPhone 5 this year, but an iPhone 4GS or something like that. It just doesn't seem logical that Apple would invest time and money in the production of a cellphone type that will be obsolete in less than 5 months.
Imagine the outrage when all these people buy white iPhones now, and three months later a new model is introduced (with a white option too).
Well, I think this is the best proof that we could get that there won't be a radically designed iPhone 5 this year, but an iPhone 4GS or something like that. It just doesn't seem logical that Apple would invest time and money in the production of a cellphone type that will be obsolete in less than 5 months.
Imagine the outrage when all these people buy white iPhones now, and three months later a new model is introduced (with a white option too).
more...
Shaved Kitty
Jun 15, 10:09 PM
Anyone?
tinman0
Apr 30, 06:10 AM
You dont seem to know how much pull Samsung has in the components arena do you?
They are
#1 in RAM Memory
#2 in semiconductor LSI
#1 in flat panel display
#1 in rechargeable battery
#2 in mobile phones over all
#1 in NAND flash memory
$8 billion to a company with revenue generation in excess of $140 billion is chunp change. That is around 4% of total revenue.
Never sue your supplier when your supplier can turn around and gobble up other suppliers and increase the price for all OEM makers, but giving itself the cost effective goods, because it also itself is an OEM maker.
Unlike Apple, who is just a customer, Samsung is BOTH a customer AND a supplier at the same time. Either way, they win.
Quite recently, Samsung attempted to take over Sandisk, the NAND flash memory company. It wasnt successful due to some differences in price offers. That alone tells you that Samsung is willing to strangle hold the market even more than it already has. NAND flash market alone, Samsung has over 30 % of the market all to itself. For RAM memory, it close to 40%.
Apple is barking up the wrong tree.
As I said earlier, Samsung are contracted to supply parts, so Apple can do anything they want.
And if Samsung stop providing parts, then they simply open the way for other fabs to take up the slack. And don't bet your bottom dollar that there are companies out there who want Apple's $$.
If Samsung allows it's competition to gear up (eg build a few extra fabs), then the value of their parts will go down as the market gets opened up.
Samsung need Apple more than Apple need Samsung.
====
Ok, for the dim, here is the problem -
Making parts is one thing, we can all make parts, we can all go into our garage and make a random widget. We can make hundreds of those widgets.
But - here is the kicker -
We need someone to buy those widgets.
If no one buys the widgets, we can't make the widgets, and in this scenario Apple sell the widget to the end user. The game is with Apple, not the parts supplier.
They are
#1 in RAM Memory
#2 in semiconductor LSI
#1 in flat panel display
#1 in rechargeable battery
#2 in mobile phones over all
#1 in NAND flash memory
$8 billion to a company with revenue generation in excess of $140 billion is chunp change. That is around 4% of total revenue.
Never sue your supplier when your supplier can turn around and gobble up other suppliers and increase the price for all OEM makers, but giving itself the cost effective goods, because it also itself is an OEM maker.
Unlike Apple, who is just a customer, Samsung is BOTH a customer AND a supplier at the same time. Either way, they win.
Quite recently, Samsung attempted to take over Sandisk, the NAND flash memory company. It wasnt successful due to some differences in price offers. That alone tells you that Samsung is willing to strangle hold the market even more than it already has. NAND flash market alone, Samsung has over 30 % of the market all to itself. For RAM memory, it close to 40%.
Apple is barking up the wrong tree.
As I said earlier, Samsung are contracted to supply parts, so Apple can do anything they want.
And if Samsung stop providing parts, then they simply open the way for other fabs to take up the slack. And don't bet your bottom dollar that there are companies out there who want Apple's $$.
If Samsung allows it's competition to gear up (eg build a few extra fabs), then the value of their parts will go down as the market gets opened up.
Samsung need Apple more than Apple need Samsung.
====
Ok, for the dim, here is the problem -
Making parts is one thing, we can all make parts, we can all go into our garage and make a random widget. We can make hundreds of those widgets.
But - here is the kicker -
We need someone to buy those widgets.
If no one buys the widgets, we can't make the widgets, and in this scenario Apple sell the widget to the end user. The game is with Apple, not the parts supplier.
more...
Popeye206
Apr 7, 09:12 AM
Only issue I want fixed is wifi. Disconnects a lot.
Do you have multiple iOS devices in the house? Or ones that come and go - like a friend visits and connects to your WiFi?
If so, there is an issue with some routers assigning the same IP to different devices and that will kick you off from time to time.
Resetting the router with both devices in the house will solve it. Happened to me when my Daughter visited and I connected her to my router. I kept loosing the WiFi. Then all was good after a router reboot. :)
Do you have multiple iOS devices in the house? Or ones that come and go - like a friend visits and connects to your WiFi?
If so, there is an issue with some routers assigning the same IP to different devices and that will kick you off from time to time.
Resetting the router with both devices in the house will solve it. Happened to me when my Daughter visited and I connected her to my router. I kept loosing the WiFi. Then all was good after a router reboot. :)
scotty96LSC
Oct 14, 01:55 PM
Where can I get these date, time, weather thingies? I'd like to have it on my desktop also.. Oh and that music player.
Sorry for the newb question. I'm new to macs.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=628023&highlight=geektool
Sorry for the newb question. I'm new to macs.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=628023&highlight=geektool
more...
DiamondGCoupe
Jan 16, 07:54 PM
I am curious as to why diesel never caught on in the US despite most automakers producing diesel models.
Noise.
Noise.
xeex
Apr 2, 04:54 AM
http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/5724/screen20shot20201104012.png
Not the most exciting!
link ?
Not the most exciting!
link ?
more...
Gibsonsoup
Feb 3, 01:01 PM
here's mine for this month. or at least until I get bored by it ;)
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4138/5414000924_6b07ee282f_b.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4138/5414000924_6b07ee282f_b.jpg
Lord Blackadder
Mar 21, 12:44 AM
Nah, too messy. Lethal injection does the trick just fine. Put them to sleep like those poor pit bulls in shelters.
Lethal injection is pretty messy. Oftentimes willing competent medical personnel are scarce, the procedure is badly executed, and things don't go very smoothly. Of course, you probably don't mind doing it a little bit sloppy and working in some extra pain, but the procedure is far from neat and clean. There is in fact plenty of evidence to the contrary.
Lethal injection is pretty messy. Oftentimes willing competent medical personnel are scarce, the procedure is badly executed, and things don't go very smoothly. Of course, you probably don't mind doing it a little bit sloppy and working in some extra pain, but the procedure is far from neat and clean. There is in fact plenty of evidence to the contrary.
r6novak
Nov 19, 04:36 PM
I wrote the email to him - Headers below. It not a fake people...
i removed my email domain so no one emails my work.
From: Steve Jobs <sjobs@apple.com>
Subject: Re: TJ Maxx? Really?
Date: November 19, 2010 11:35:35 AM EST
To: Robert Novak <Robert.Novak@.com>
Received: from ma1ex02..com ([10.10.137.20]) by MA1WP1004..com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:39 -0500
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.3.131]) by ma1ex02..com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from source ([17.254.13.23]) (using TLSv1) by exprod8mx231.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:37 EST
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA824BE7291F for <Robert.Novak@.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earhart.apple.com (yeager.apple.com [17.150.10.19]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 24.35.06455.757A6EC4; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Auditid: 11807137-b7bf5ae000001937-8b-4ce6a757bc75
In-Reply-To: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
Message-Id: <179393F0-DC7A-417A-9198-72EC02EEADF7@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Iz2tfVRC00zRUwOWALJwNw)"
References: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
X-Pstn-Levels: (S:99.36494/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-Pstn-Settings: 5 (2.0000:0.3000) s cv GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-Pstn-Addresses: from <sjobs@apple.com> [133/9]
Return-Path: sjobs@apple.com
X-Originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2010 16:35:39.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCC6A470:01CB8807]
X-Tm-As-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4177-6.500.1024-17778.000
X-Tm-As-Result: No--27.709100-8.000000-31
X-Tm-As-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-Tm-As-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Email...
They are not an authorized reseller.
On Nov 19, at 8:11 AM, Robert Novak wrote:
Steve,
i removed my email domain so no one emails my work.
From: Steve Jobs <sjobs@apple.com>
Subject: Re: TJ Maxx? Really?
Date: November 19, 2010 11:35:35 AM EST
To: Robert Novak <Robert.Novak@.com>
Received: from ma1ex02..com ([10.10.137.20]) by MA1WP1004..com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:39 -0500
Received: from psmtp.com ([64.18.3.131]) by ma1ex02..com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from source ([17.254.13.23]) (using TLSv1) by exprod8mx231.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:35:37 EST
Received: from relay16.apple.com (relay16.apple.com [17.128.113.55]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA824BE7291F for <Robert.Novak@.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from earhart.apple.com (yeager.apple.com [17.150.10.19]) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 24.35.06455.757A6EC4; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:35:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Auditid: 11807137-b7bf5ae000001937-8b-4ce6a757bc75
In-Reply-To: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
Message-Id: <179393F0-DC7A-417A-9198-72EC02EEADF7@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Iz2tfVRC00zRUwOWALJwNw)"
References: <7001A0544E30AE498F6FF188E875DBBC0DF4AEAC@MA1WP1004..com>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
X-Pstn-Levels: (S:99.36494/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-Pstn-Settings: 5 (2.0000:0.3000) s cv GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-Pstn-Addresses: from <sjobs@apple.com> [133/9]
Return-Path: sjobs@apple.com
X-Originalarrivaltime: 19 Nov 2010 16:35:39.0191 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCC6A470:01CB8807]
X-Tm-As-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4177-6.500.1024-17778.000
X-Tm-As-Result: No--27.709100-8.000000-31
X-Tm-As-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-Tm-As-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Email...
They are not an authorized reseller.
On Nov 19, at 8:11 AM, Robert Novak wrote:
Steve,
Butters
Nov 1, 09:45 AM
How can I tell the difference?
new: http://images.apple.com/ipodnano/images/specsearbudsvert20060912.jpg
old: http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39931000/jpg/_39931535_bull-apple203.jpg
new: http://images.apple.com/ipodnano/images/specsearbudsvert20060912.jpg
old: http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/39931000/jpg/_39931535_bull-apple203.jpg
withnail
Nov 1, 10:39 PM
You should only use that option to convert AIFF CD Audio files NOT mp3 files. Your quality will go in the toilet if you try to convert mp3 directly to AAC at any bit rate. Plus it does take a long time to make that crappy conversion.
True - I imagine that it would indeed. I already turned the option off because it didn't seem like it would be too helpful...
True - I imagine that it would indeed. I already turned the option off because it didn't seem like it would be too helpful...
BakedBeans
Nov 1, 05:29 AM
were is the other free /app tool thread?
jrko
Apr 4, 04:49 AM
Both Sata PCI cards arrived this morning!! Just need some sata cables now :D
And my apple mouse. Its the white one with a clear outside body and white inner case where the entire body is the button and without the track ball. It matches the white apple keyboard well. I think they are both of the generation that came out with the G5 macs as they are the same as I got with my imac G5 way back when
And my apple mouse. Its the white one with a clear outside body and white inner case where the entire body is the button and without the track ball. It matches the white apple keyboard well. I think they are both of the generation that came out with the G5 macs as they are the same as I got with my imac G5 way back when
pdxflint
Feb 25, 05:30 AM
Welcome to the digital photo forum. I look forward to seeing your work.
No comments:
Post a Comment